A Comparative Study Installation Arrangement of Primary Flight Display (PFD) in the Flight Deck’s Regional Passenger Transport Aircraft

Anantia Prakasa, Indra Permana Sophian

Abstract

The Flight Deck or cockpit is designed to support the prosecution of its aircraft mission and these are what the Flight Deck design process needs to ensure but not limited to display design, aircraft control, automation, HCI on the Flight Deck and pilot’s view to outside namely external vision. The external vision must satisfy regulatory requirements which intended to ensure that the view is adequate for pilots to operate the aircraft safely and gives them a reasonable opportunity to see and avoid other aircraft that pose a collision threat. Concurrently during critical periods of flight, it is important that the flight crew access information in front of his view with minimal head rotation. Cockpit-Displays with critical flight information should then be located to these locations. Compromising both external and internal vision as Pilot’s visibility should be attained. Further, some OPTIONs to arrange the PFD in cockpit instrument panel give difficulty in term of its panel space, safety and comfort for the pilots. Two layout PFD’s, In-line and T-line layout, are evaluated in the new Regional Aircraft Cockpit using avionics 15.1” or 14.1” display. Due to cockpit space, the In-Line four of 15.1” display cannot fit the instrument panel and disregard; however the T-Line for 15.1” display is possible as OPTION 1. The four of 14.1” displays are possible to arrange as In-Line and T-Line layout as OPTION 2 and OPTION 3 respectively, and both may offer compliance to regulatory requirements also to both Pilot’s external and internal vision.

Keywords

Flight Deck/Cockpit, Primary Flight Display (PFD), regulatory requirements, flight crew’s external / internal vision, pilot visibility

Full Text:

PDF

References

S. Burgess, S. Boyd, and D. Boyd, “Fatal General Aviation Accidents in Furtherance of Business (1996–2015): Rates, Risk Factors, and Accident Causes,” J. Aviat. Technol. Eng., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 2018.

T. Don, “Egypt Air Boeing 777 to Cairo clipped the London-bound Virgin Atlantic flight Pictures taken by passengers show Virgin jet’s wing tip being loaded onto truck,” 2019.

M. Penipuan and D. K. S. Radityo, “Kronologi Senggolan Lion Air dan Wings,” vol. 23, pp. 2017–2020, 2017.

Society of Automotive Engineer (SAE) Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP), “SAE ARP 5056,” ARP5056_Flight Deck Des. Process Part 25 Aircr., vol. 4970, 2006.

M. Yeh, C. Swider, Y. J. Jo, and C. Donovan, “Human Factors Considerations in the Design and Evaluation of Flight Deck Displays and Controls Version 2.0,” p. 396, 2016.

Y. Zhang, Y. Sun, and Y. Chen, “A Framework for Ergonomics Design of Transport Category Airplane Cockpit,” Procedia Eng., vol. 80, pp. 573–580, 2014.

Federal Aviation Administration, “Advisory Circular Advisory Circular AC 25.773-1,” Advis. Circ., no. August, pp. 1–20, 2012.

Federal Aviation Administration, “AC 25-11B Electronic Flight Display.”

Federal Aviation Administration, “Advisory Circular 25.1322-1: Flightcrew Alerting,” Fed. Aviat. Adm., pp. 1–42, 2010.

G. P. No, “RECOMMENDED PRACTICES AND GUIDELINES FOR PART 23 COCKPIT / FLIGHT DECK DESIGN,” no. 10.

M. Yeh, Y. J. Jo, C. Donovan, S. Gabree, J. A. Volpe, and N. Transportation, “Human Factors Considerations in the Design and Evaluation of Flight Deck Displays and Controls,” 2013.

Federal Aviation Administration, “Aviation Circular Approval of Flight Guidance Systems,” Aviat. Circ. Approv. Flight Guid. Syst., pp. 1–120, 2016.

L. L. Lowry, “Federal Aviation Administration,” SAGE Int. Encycl. Travel Tour., pp. 505–506, 2017.

Article Metrics

Abstract view: 332 times
Download     : 146   times

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.