Optimization of Turn Around Time Calculation for C05-Check Aircraft Maintenance Using Critical Path Method (CPM) On Boeing 737-900er Aircraft

Abstract

Boeing 737-900 ER maintenance in Indonesia emphasizes timely, efficient routines to minimize risks. Using the Critical Path Method (CPM), the analysis calculates the Turn Around Time (TAT) for C05-Check maintenance. The CPM results estimate a TAT of 20.47 days (rounded to 20 days), while the company's data shows 21.73 days (rounded to 22 days), indicating a 2-day difference. This discrepancy highlights potential areas for improving maintenance efficiency. The TAT efficiency for the maintenance process is calculated at 0.057%. Optimizing mechanic workload based on this analysis can enhance turnaround times and ensure aircraft safety and operational scheduling. Accurate TAT predictions are vital for balancing maintenance quality with airline efficiency, making CPM a valuable tool in operational planning and resource allocation. Continued comparison with company data ensures maintenance practices remain precise, reducing unexpected delays and maintaining flight safety standards.

Keywords

Boeing 737-900ER; C05-Check Maintenance; Critical Path Method; Turn Around Time

Full Text:

Artikel PDF

References

[1] Indonesia, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2009 Tentang Penerbangan. .

[2] Ahmad Buana Syamra Pratama Rahman, Mufti Arifin, and Syarifah Fairuza, “Pengembangan Laboratorium Virtual untuk Pelatihan Perencanaan Pemeliharaan Pesawat Terbang,” J. Mhs. Dirgant., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 37–47, 2024, doi: 10.35894/jmd.v3i1.121.

[3] F. Fahri, B. Harahap, and S. Suliawati, “Analisis Efektivitas Preventive Maintenance dengan Metode Periodic Inspection untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja pada Unit WA800-3,” Blend Sains J. Tek., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 246–267, 2025, doi: 10.56211/blendsains.v3i3.799.

[4] M. Idris and M. C. P. A. Islami, “Implementation Of Critical Path Method And Critical Chain Project Management For Project Schedulling,” Jati Emas (Jurnal Apl. Tek. dan Pengabdi. Masyarakat), vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 229–234, 2025.

[5] M. F. Chasan, D. A. S. Fauji, and H. Purnomo, “Evaluasi Penjadwalan Waktu Dan Biaya Dengan Metode CPM Dan Gantt Chart Pada Proyek Pembangunan Rumah Tipe 60/72 Griya Keraton Sambirejo Kediri,” Simp. Manaj. dan Bisnis, no. 1, pp. 100–108, 2022.

[6] R. Wulandari, A. H. Maksum, A. E. Nugraha, Sutrisno, and N. Rahmawati, “Evaluasi Penjadwalan Waktu dan Biaya Pada Proyek Pembangunan Rumah Tinggal Menggunakan Critical Path Method (CPM),” J. Ind. Eng. Oper. Manag., vol. 08, no. 01, pp. 107–115, 2025.

[7] Kasmaida, M. N. T, Jasman, and I. Fadly, “Analisis Network Planning Dengan CPM (Critical Path Method) Dalam Rangka Efisiensi Waktu Dan Biaya Pada Pembangunan Gedung Bertingkat (Studi Kasus Sdn 16 Kab.Pinrang),” Sultra Civ. Eng. J., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 553–562, 2025.

[8] W. P. R. Wilar, G. Y. Malingkas, and J. B. Mangare, “Penerapan Manajemen Waktu Dengan Metode CPM (Critical Path Method) Pada Proyek Pembangunan Laboratorium SMKS Kema Perintis,” Tekno, vol. 23, no. 91, pp. 108–116, 2025.

[9] F. Clea Putri, A. Alpian, I. L. Ristiandi, and T. N. Tasya, “Perhitungan CPM Pada Proyek Improvement Sistem Automatis OEE Pada Line Produksi SKM PT Indolakto,” Metod. J. Tek. Ind., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 12–21, 2023, doi: 10.33506/mt.v9i1.2235.

[10] R. Nurdin, C. A. Arrasyid, and U. Mauidzoh, “Penerapan Critical Path Method (CPM) Guna Meningkatkan Efisiensi Pada Perawatan C-Check Pesawat Boeing 737-500 (PK-NAS) (Studi Kasus di PT. Merpati Maintenance Facility),” J. Rekayasa Sist. Ind., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 46–59, 2025, doi: 10.26593/jrsi.v14i1.7861.46-59.

[11] N. F. Pangestu, A. F. A. Zahra, and S. Sutrisno, “Penerapan Metode Critical Parth Method (CPM) dalam Proyek Pembangunan Jembatan Alun-Alun Kota Kuningan,” J. Ind. Manuf. Eng., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 100–106, 2021, doi: 10.31289/jime.v5i2.4925.

[12] A. Renanggi, L. M. Saleh, and M. Marantika, “Estimasi Anggaran Biaya Dan Waktu Pelaksanaan Rehabilitasi Rumah Tahanan Negara Kelas IIa Ambon,” Innov. J. Soc. …, vol. 3, pp. 2813–2824, 2023.

[13] M. Agus, S. E. Priana, and S. Dewi, “Optimasi Penjadwalan Proyek Menggunakan Metode Critical Path Method (CPM),” Rangkiang J., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 228–236, 2025.

[14] Alamsyah, R. S. Ismail, and T. Hidayat, “Analisa Perhitungan Pekerjaan Reparasi Kapal Dengan Metode Critical Path Method (CPM),” SPECTA J. Technol., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 84–91, 2020, doi: 10.35718/specta.v4i1.172.

[15] W. Yuwono, M. E. Kaukab, and Y. Mahfud, “Kajian Metode PERT-CPM dan Pemanfaatannya dalam Manajemen Waktu dan Biaya Pelaksanaan Proyek,” J. Econ. Manag. Account. Technol., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 192–214, 2021, doi: 10.32500/jematech.v4i2.1925.

[16] F. K. Rahmawati and S. I. Prakoso, “Analysis Turn Around Time C03-Check Package on Airbus A320-200,” Conf. Senat. STT Adisutjipto Yogyakarta, vol. 5, pp. 9–16, 2019, doi: 10.28989/senatik.v5i0.319.

http://dx.doi.org/10.28989/vortex.v6i2.3644

Article Metrics

Abstract view: 1 times
Download     : 0   times

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Refbacks

• There are currently no refbacks.