Netiquette concept at the assessment of college student social competence with TOPSIS method

Abstract

Social competence of students college is important during the process of implementing the practicum, from social competence we can find out capable the students are in several ways such as the ability to collaborate, speak in forums, reduce social conflicts in the environment, make a network and much more. In this study, it provides a model solution for assessing social competence in students college when carrying out practicum. The purpose of the study was to develop an assessment model by measuring students' social competence during the implementation of the practicum. The number of correspondents in the study was 78 students taken from the number of practicum students in Aerospace Engineering. The data analysis technique uses the TOPSIS method, where the results of this study will obtain the best ranking of 78 KP students who have the highest social competence value. The model of the assessment can be used by lecturers of the Aerospace Engineering, Adisutjipto Aerospace Technology Institute during the practicum process or after. With this assessment model, the advantages of the Adisutjipto Aerospace Technology Institute can synergize in creating graduates with a global and humanistic character.

Keywords

netiquette; topsis; social competence

Full Text:

PDF

References

W. Tan et al., “A Novel Coronavirus Genome Identified in a Cluster of Pneumonia Cases - Wuhan, China 2019-2020.,” China CDC Wkly., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 61–62, 2020.

S. Van de Velde et al., “Depressive symptoms in higher education students during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. An examination of the association with various social risk factors across multiple high- and middle-income countries,” SSM - Popul. Heal., vol. 16, no. June, p. 100936, 2021.

T. Hale, A. Noam, K. Beatriz, A. Petherick, T. Phillips, and S. Webster, “Variations in government responses to COVID-19 Version 7.0,” Blavatnik Sch. Gov. Work. Pap., vol. 31, pp. 2011–2020, 2020.

S. N. Orfan and A. H. Elmyar, “Public Knowledge, Practices and Attitudes Towards Covid-19 in Afghanistan,” Public Heal. Indones., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 104–115, 2020.

D. Mali and H. Lim, “How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic?,” Int. J. Manag. Educ., vol. 19, no. 3, p. 100552, 2021.

N. Mona, “Konsep Isolasi Dalam Jaringan Sosial Untuk Meminimalisasi Efek Contagious (Kasus Penyebaran Virus Corona Di Indonesia),” J. Sos. Hum. Terap., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 117–125, 2020.

R. Khani and R. Darabi, “Flouting the Netiquette Rules in the Academic Correspondence in Iran,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 98, pp. 898–907, 2014.

Y. Fahrimal, “Netiquette: Etika Jejaring Sosial Generasi Milenial Dalam Media Sosial,” J. Penelit. Pers dan Komun. Pembang., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 69–78, 2018.

Y. S. Sitepu, “Persepsi Mahasiswa Fisip Universitas Sumatera Utara Mengenai Netiket Di Dunia Maya,” Sociae Polites, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 85–104, 2017.

Y. Fahrimal, “Etika Berkomunikasi di Dunia Maya dengan Netiquette,” Semin. Nas. Mat. dan Pendidik. Mat., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 69–78, 2006.

V. Ho, “Constructing identities through request e-mail discourse,” J. Pragmat., vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 2253–2261, 2010.

J. M. Lightfoot, “A comparative analysis of e-mail and face-to-face communication in an educational environment,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 217–227, 2006.

M. I. Dwipayani, A. S. Honggowibowo, and D. Nugraheny, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Cuti Pegawai Menggunakan Metode Technique for Order Preference By Similarity To Ideal Solution (Topsis) (Studi Kasus Di Kantor Pelayanan Perbendaharaan Negara Yogyakarta),” Compiler, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 47–61, 2012.

B. Roy, “The Optimisation Problem Formulation: Criticism and Overstepping,” J. Oper. Res. Soc., vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 427–436, 1981.

R. Rahim et al., “TOPSIS Method Application for Decision Support System in Internal Control for Selecting Best Employees,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1028, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2018.

A. Borawska, “Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Using Topsis Method For Interval Data In Research Into The Level Of Information Society Development,” Folia Oeconomica Stetin., vol. 13, 2014.

G. Kabir and A. A. Hasin, “COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TOPSIS AND FUZZY TOPSIS FOR THE EVALUATION OF TRAVEL WEBSITE SERVICE QUALITY,” 2012.

S. H. Zanakis, A. Solomon, N. A. Wishart, and S. Dublish, “Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 107, pp. 507–529, 1998.

A. M. Yaakob and A. Gegov, “Interactive TOPSIS Based Group Decision Making Methodology Using Z-Numbers,” Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 311–324, 2016.

B. Singaravel and T. Selvaraj, “Optimizacija parametara obrade u postupcima tokarenja primjenom kombinacije TOPSIS i AHP metode,” Teh. Vjesn., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1475–1480, 2015.

http://dx.doi.org/10.28989/compiler.v10i2.1114

Article Metrics

Abstract view: 380 times
Download     : 224   times

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Refbacks

• There are currently no refbacks.